comment listing type:
Top New Livemusic Videos by Vote
Subscribe
Top 15 Sifters of All Time
Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week
VideoSift Links
comment listing type: Top New Livemusic Videos by Vote Subscribe Top 15 Sifters of All Time Top 15 Sifters of the Past Week VideoSift Links |
The Schindler Jews Today
^ Time is a relative concept.
Assuming you're living as the rest of us on earth, not relative enough to make this video description anything other than misleading. Probably to get yourself more votes, i imagine. It's the videosift way! Sometimes the vote-fishing on this site reaches sensationalism only usually achieved by newspapers. Come on boys, we're better than those lot! We can do it!
Also, there are actors in there. The real life counter-parts are aided/chaperoned by the actors from the film.
Unless those children/young adults who you can see in the video have undergone the same relativistic effects as you, and 70 years has passed for them in a few days!
As for the final scene of Schindler's List. Great film, a moment that moved me most amid nothing BUT moving moments.
Zero Punctuation - Mercenaries 2
Thank god i ridiculed those so quick to say "he's lost it" when his 11th-15th review weren't as side splittingly hilarious as his first 10.
Zero Punctuation - Mercenaries 2
No one cares who posted it, nor should you care about posting it.. that's not what the sift is about.
Guy on "To catch a predator" gets tased; screams like a girl
The ones i'm talking about are the cases that look like a 22 year old who just hasn't grown up, as though they just skipped 7 years of their life and never had the teenage years. I can partially identify with feeling like you didn't have those years due to certain aspects of my life stealing those same years from me, and perhaps that's why i just sympathise with them.
Not sympathise as in "poor guy, let him have sex with that 13 year old".. i mean "poor guy, i don't think he realises the age gap". I think someone in that mental position is about as capable of "choosing their own way in life" as a 13 year old is capable of making decisions about who they're about to have sex with, and from there i can almost compare it to two 14 year olds trying it on for the first time.
Then i remember a picture of a "paedophile" i saw when i was a bit younger, he looked like he was about 16 and my immediate reaction to half the story was "how can they call him a paedophile?". Then i found out he was 22 and he'd arrived to pick up the under-age girl from an airport with a pistol and various shackles.
And then, of course, i think "what if that was my daughter?" It all leaves me very confused about this show.
I hope this came across in the right way
[this isn't about this video really, just a conversation piece]
Fat kid gets bullied, cries like a girl
Nearly unanimous vote for Obama = "split" on FOX
Paula Radcliffe London Marathon 2005 - Peeing and Winning
ADD Cure
sigh the problem is that is just doesn't work.
The fuck it doesn't. Any of the kids around my neighborhood acted stupid and they got a slap on the legs... seriously....... no one had ADD 20 years ago, now suddenly everyone has it.
I could accept that perhaps a few people have some sort of hormonal imbalance and perhaps are warranting some kind of treatment, but perhaps only 1 in 1000 of the people today who "have ADD". And in the past, the slap on the legs would have made the "condition" half as bad.
Pick a damn magazine!
How George Carlin Handles a Heckler
Jimmy Carr vs. Heckler
LMFAO!! I just followed a link from my Youtube page to find this video here. Glad people seem to be enjoying it. And for anyone that's wondering I knew everyline he was going to say as I'd shouted exactly the same thing out about 2 months before at a different show. The bit you don't see on the DVD(it is edited together from 4 different shows) is where he says "go on have another go, I do this for a living, I love it" and I replied "Yeah, thats what your mum said". Was brilliantly funny and I can't wait for the next DVD!!
rofl great comeback from you then
How George Carlin Handles a Heckler
This was absolute garbage. No interplay, no exchange, simply 1 person swearing a lot at another person.
http://www.videosift.com/video/Jimmy-Carr-vs-Heckler
Watch and learn, Carlin + sift......watch and learn. How the fuck that sublime masterpiece gets 100 votes and this trash gets 112 i will never know. Oh yeah now i remember, if it's american it gets more votes.
Ron Paul on the Dollar: Given 1 Minute to speak: Bailout USD
W H Y W A S N ' T T H I S M A N M A D E P R E S I D E N T ?
I hope everyone remembers 6 months ago when i was saying that this guy was a fucking genius, dispensing ass kickings and crippling counter arguments time after time after time........
Shame i'm not in the country to have voted for him.
World's Biggest Dick
Christianity In A Nutshell
>> ^EDD:
^The point here isn't about bigotry. It's about the hypocrisy of Christian dogma of "spreading the 'one true' faith with sword and fire" among 'non-believers'. Last I checked, atheists had no such universal "mission statement".
What you just said applies to any fundamentalism and you cannot define an entire movement into a single facet. The hypocrisy runs both ways that's why I am saying is incorrect to limit this notion of absolutism to just Christianity. Atheism has ranges too, take Dawkins for example, this guy can't even respect someone for two minutes if that person holds a view opposite to them since he generalizes about the degree of dogma that the person holds which is hypocritical in the first place because if he takes that road he starts to resemble the very people he mocks.
This is almost entirely incorrect. Why do people feel the need to lie about dawkins? He doesn't disrespect people for having a different opinion to himself - he feels sorry for (and superior to) people who believe in an aged and childish belief system of screwing your fists up into a ball and hoping till you cry that life will continue somehow.
You were doing great up to that point, i was with you on the whole "don't tar everyone with the same brush" and "it's not just x religion that does this" stuff. But it seems like you've never listened to an unbiased cutting of a dawkins interview. Either that, or you listen to it with a pre-formed bias (which you are criticising in others)
I mean, if he said he liked radiohead, and you said you didn't, he wouldn't heap derision or scorn on you. If he said he was atheist and you said you weren't, he wouldn't heap derision or scorn on you. If you got into a discussion and you said something stupid, THEN he'd heap derision and scorn on you.